Featured Post

Box Review: 2024 Topps Archives Collector's Box (Lunch Box)

The 2024 Topps Archives set was released in early 2025 and I was able to grab both a Hobby box and a Collector's box to use for a recent group break over on my Discord.  



Since I'm not above "double-dipping," I now get to use that same Collector's lunch box for a review on the blog!

Let's start with tin itself, a lovely little tin complete with a handle and latch.  


The lunch box comes in a cardboard box so you won't know which of the four designs you'll get until you open up the outer box.  In our case, we got a Yankee-centric Aaron Judge lunchbox.  The blue color works well with the photos of the Judge cards.  The only improvement that I'd suggest Topps do next time is to put different photos on the front and the back of the tin, otherwise, this is a nice-looking (but small) lunch box!

Once you open up the lunch box, you are greeted with ten eight-card packs.  The outer box promises one autograph plus 4 exclusive purple parallels per box.  As it turned out, most of our box was base cards so let's begin with those.


The 300-card base set features three past Topps designs (1961, 1970, and 1994).  I've never quite figured out how Topps picks out its designs for the Archives brand, but I must admit that this year's selections aren't among my favorite Topps designs.  

Our box had the following:
  • 23 cards in the 1961 design
  • 23 cards in the 1970 design
  • 24 cards in the 1994 design
You can't ask for a much better distribution than that!  I did go through the CMP codes on the back of the cards to see if we had any variations but we came up empty on that front.

As I mentioned at the top of the post, each Collector's tin promises four exclusive Purple parallels.  


The purple foil really shines nicely on the cards, though purple might not be the best border color choice for a team like the Brewers.  As a group break host, I would have liked to have seen all four purple parallels be of different teams but at least we got a nice Bryce Harper out of it!

Moving on to the inserts, our box produced a total of four regular inserts spread across four different sets.


Quite honestly, the designs of these sort of blend together - all of them are on foilboard and none of the designs have any particular nostalgic ties to me at least.  You'll notice another Brewer here as well (Churio rookie card).

While all of the above pulls are probably par for the course of an average tin, we did get one unexpected goodie:


That's an "At the Break" Green foilboard parallel.  According to Topps' website, the odds of finding one of those in a Collector's tin is 1:1,954 packs!!  The card is serially numbered out of 99 on the reverse.  That's definitely a nice pull for the Cardinals' spot in the break!

Finally, our one promised autograph:


Generally speaking, I like the Fan Favorites autograph concept that Topps Archives is known for.  It can be fun to get a signature of a guy that doesn't appear in most Topps' products.  Examples for this year's checklist include guys like Jim Abbott, Andre Dawson, and Jimmy Key.  Unfortunately for us, I wouldn't put Slade Cecconi in that same category but at least the design of the card works well for a signature!

Overall, I give the 2024 Topps Archives (Collector's Tin) the following rating:
Set Design:  D
Collation:  A
Opening Thrill:  C
Overall:  C-

We had no collation issues and we did score a rare card, however, it was hard for me to get super excited about the three card designs used in this year's Archives.  In addition, there were some terrible color choices on some of the cards making for nearly unreadable text.  Truthfully, a lot of the design choices made it seem like Topps totally phoned it in when fine-tuning this year's Archives set.  Our box over-delivered on what was promised and yet, I still felt underwhelmed overall. 

Comments

  1. Have never been impressed with Archives and it's getting worse. I wasn't even curious enough to watch your video and I almost always do whether I'm in the break or not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Historically, I've had good luck with Archives in terms of what I get (both in my individual boxes and in group break boxes and that held true for the recent group break). That said, I think the Archives brand has gotten worse and worse (while simultaneously getting more and more expensive). It's not a set that I'll be chasing, I can tell you that!

      Delete
  2. I mentioned on another blog that Topps messed with the 1970 design by not having the name in script. Now that you've posted the box, I see that the box design DOES show the name in script, but not the actual cards! Curiouser and curiouser.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A. I really liked the original Chrome New Breed inserts from the late 90's... especially the refractors. It's kind of weird that they decided to produce a non-Chrome version.

    B. Not sure when Topps started adding rookies to their Fan Favorites autograph checklist... but I'm not a fan. Wish they'd go back to them using retired fan favorites.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am not a big fan of this year's Archives set but something keeps telling me to buy some when I see them. I guess it's because I want to try to pull cards of players I collect. Speaking of those players, one is Jose Ramirez and I like that insert of his that you got.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I was remotely excited to open Archives this year, I did 2 lunch boxes and 2 hobby boxes. I didn't have a lot of the marking on the chrome cards that people were talking about. I got a Jim Edmonds Auto and a Evan Carter /50 chrome. The other two were pitchers I have never known about. The collation was WAY better than Stadium Club. Out of those 4 boxes I got 2 full base sets so I was pretty happy about that. I also don't know if it was just me but the cards in the 94 design, had fuzzy/blurry pictures which almost was consistent the real 94 set.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment